The Business Opportunity in Underutilized Assets

Two of the highly valued startups currently, Uber and AirBnB are platforms that turn highly underutilized assets into monetization opportunities for ‘sellers’. For example, take the case of Uber. Morgan Stanley estimates that cars are utilized to the tune of only 4%. With Uber, sellers (car owners) can turn their highly underutilized assets (cars) into income generating opportunities.

The Internet helps in the ‘discovery’ of these seller assets by buyers. So the internet ensures sellers can find a market for their underutilized assets. Since theoretically, any positive cash flow with these otherwise non-monetized assets is welcome for sellers, buyers too get a better price over other solutions. And the 2008 financial crisis played no small role in the success of Uber and AirBnB where sellers wanted new income and buyers wanted a better price. (To be noted that Uber was more than a better price. It was a better product for customers in a market that was protected for long and where supply was artificially constrained).

Let’s stay with cars and vehicles for a minute. Can there be any other way this highly underutilized asset – the car, can be monetized?

Wrapify is a startup that turns cars into moving ads. The startup offers a two-sided platform between drivers/car owners and advertisers. The drivers can sign up and if they meet a set of minimum requirements, Wrapify will ‘wrap’ their car into ads like shown below.

23 Wrapify

Image Source: click here

Wrapify then using its algorithms calculates the amount of ‘impressions’ the advertiser got from the car moving around (for example higher the traffic, higher the impressions and hence higher the payout). The timing might be great at a time when wages are still stagnant and more and more drivers are complaining about Uber. Maybe a Uber+Wrapify will put more money into the pockets of drivers.

Veniam is another example. It incredibly turns the ‘underutilized asset’ of public transport into something remarkable. Co-founded by the founder of Zipcar, the startup claims to develop the networking fabric for ‘Internet of Moving Things’. The ambitious startup attempts to blanket entire cities in seamless Wi-Fi. Basically, the engineers tap into a city’s existing internet infrastructure and at many points place wireless routers. Then a fleet of public transportation – buses, garbage trucks, police cars and the like are fitted with Veniam’s NetRider routers which receive wireless signals from access points, creating hotspots on the move. It creates a mesh network that covers the entire city and the public needs one login and no hot-spot hopping.

Skills, Knowledge and Time are a commonly underutilized asset. Take a paper and jot down your top 3 skills. And how many of these skills do you use at your day job? The unused skills are underutilized and are potentially possible to monetize. Again the internet makes it easy for ‘discovery’ of people with different sets of skills and ‘discovery’ of demand for these skills. Many businesses and organizations have already been founded on this premise.

Quora unlocks the knowledge residing in individuals. Wikipedia survives on the knowledge of its volunteers. Innocentive, a platform that connects problem solvers with organizations is a typical example. Innocentive in 2007 sought solutions to help clean up remaining oil from the 1989 Exxon Valdez Disaster. A solver named John Davis successfully solved it and was awarded the prize of $20,000. The kicker? He didn’t have any background in the Oil Industry. He was working in the concrete industry. Players on FoldIt solved a scientific problem of deciphering the crystal structure of Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, an AIDS causing virus that was unsolved for 15 years. How long did these players take? 10 days! Are you working at some day job but you have a knack for advertising and can think up good ideas for advertisements? Then Tongal is the place for you. Top brands like Frito-Lay, Hasbro, Colgate, Gillette, Pantene post challenges on the platform for new creative ideas for advertisements. You can submit short ideas, pitches and even videos (they are in a staged process) and earn money for each stage if your ideas are selected. Kaggle is another interesting platform hosting challenges for Data Scientists. The company boasts more than 400,000 data scientists on its platform and has clients including GE, Mastercard, Amazon, Merck and Facebook.

There are still lots of skills that can be unlocked for different purposes.

  • If you have knowledge in law, can you be connected to someone who is ignorant about it but needs to get justice?
  • Lots of women in India cook food day in and day out for their families. And they are paid nothing for it. Can that be monetized by connecting them with willing buyers who want home cooked food?
  • Can people working in well paid jobs but looking for more meaning in life be connected to non-profits who would value your level of expertise on something but cannot afford to pay?

There is a flip side to the story though. People with skills that are available abundantly in the population may have a negative impact as their wages are driven down by technology. The great economist Ronald Coase in 1937 wrote an influential article called the ‘The Nature of the Firm’ where he focused on a simple question – why does a firm exist? His answer was ‘transaction costs’. If you are always contracting out every piece of your work, you have to search, evaluate and pay for every job that ends up costing more than hiring somebody full time. So companies hire full time. Enter the internet. The internet makes the ‘search’, i.e. finding employees easy. So for skills abundantly available, it becomes easier and easier to contract out. A study finds that in the United States, around 53 million people freelance which is a huge percentage of the population (35% of the workforce). It is difficult to make the case that their underutilized time is being ‘monetized’ in all cases.

Capital is another asset that may be underutilized. Bain Capital published an important research in 2012 titled ‘A world awash with money’. Here’s what they had to say about it.

“Our analysis leads us to conclude that for the balance of the decade, markets will generally continue to grapple with an environment of capital superabundance. Even with moderating financial growth in developed markets, the fundamental forces that inflated the global balance sheet since the 1980s—financial innovation, high-speed computing and reliance on leverage—are still in place. Moreover, as financial markets in China, India and other emerging economies continue to develop their own financial sectors, total global capital will expand by half again, to an estimated $900 trillion (from $600 billion in 2012) by 2020. More than any other factor on the horizon, the self-generating momentum for capital to expand—and the sheer size the financial sector has attained—will influence the shape and tempo of global economic growth going forward.”

“… Businesses and investors will struggle to find a sufficient supply of attractive, productive assets to absorb the amount of financial capital they have to invest, driving up asset prices and forcing them to lower their expectations for high rates of return on investments.”

In the era of low interest rates, can a new platform help divert capital to important and/or high return activity? Can some of this capital efficiently be diverted to high impact philanthropy or say social innovations?

According to me, Information is another asset that is heavily underutilized. Google and Facebook are some of the most valuable businesses because of the ‘information’ that can be unlocked in different ways. But new billion dollar companies will be built around underutilized information. This is primarily because of the development and advances in Machine Learning. Machine Learning to put in a simple way is used to find patterns in large amounts of data and give computers the ability to learn without being explicitly programmed. Kevin Kelly of Wired writes,

“In fact, the business plans of the next 10,000 startups are easy to forecast: Take X and add AI. This is a big deal, and not it’s here.”

Hyperbole or not, huge amounts of value will be unlocked from different types of data. It may disrupt many industries, especially professional services like Consulting and Finance in the process.

A startup Orbital Insight turns the ever improving Satellite images into valuable information for retailers, hedge funds and real estate companies. The startup uses its machine learning algorithms along with the power of hundreds of computers running on the cloud on millions of images to come up with interesting insights. The startup correctly predicted that Home Depot was going to have a blow-out quarter by looking at car counts during the past five years (the counting and analysis was automated of course).

14 Orbital Insights

Cognitive Logic helps organizations to pool data to get new insights without being anxious about privacy. In this case, ‘un-pooled’ data is an asset that is far less utilized.

Waldo Photos is attempting to build one of the very interesting business models I’ve seen in the recent times. It is a two-sided platform that connects customers with professional photographers. Sounds banal? Here’s the catch. All you need to do is take a selfie. And Waldo Photos will find your photos wherever they are in whichever professional photographer’s pockets. For example, say you go to a basketball game. And professional photographers capture multiple shots of the crowd. Waldo makes sure you find a picture you are in if it was taken by a photographer who have signed up as well. (Here the photographs with the photographers are the underutilized assets). Building a marketplace around it with image recognition is indeed an interesting idea.

Here are some more examples of underutilized information:

  • There is lots of value in the countless blogs, articles and journals lying around the internet underutilized. Can machine learning unlock its value and can you build a business model that disrupts consulting?
  • Can the crumbs left online by an individual like tweets, blog posts, Github submissions, Quora answers etc. be used to assess their skill and talent and can that disrupt recruiting?
  • Can lots of value be unlocked in electronic health records and digitized medical records?

Reimagining Businesses from the Ground up

When a new technology enabler arrives, entrepreneurs try to build businesses around it. And numbers of new startups really explode when the new technology enabler is sufficiently distributed to customers. For example, when more homes started getting the internet or when smartphone adoption explodes in a country, entrepreneurs and venture capitalists are in a mad rush to build businesses and deploy capital respectively.

Selling books around in a retail store? Then sell the same books online. Selling diapers in a retail store? Then sell the same online or as a subscription. Do you call a landline phone to book a cab? Use your smartphone to book a cab. Do you book movie tickets by standing in a queue? Then do the same online. Are you booking hotels calling a landline number? Do the same online.

Some successfully businesses have been built by doing the above. But what has changed is only the customer ‘interface’. The books remain the same, the diapers remain the same, the cabs remain the same, movies are produced in the same manner and the hotels remain the same.

What is truly transformational is when the underlying products themselves change. That is a true reimagination of business. Think about booking hotels. With AirBnB you can convert your underutilized living space into Hospitality. The underlying product that was transacted – the hotel room in itself is now different. AirBnB projects that during the Super Bowl weekend in Feb 2016, over 15000 guests will be staying at AirBnB listings.

Salesforce reimagined how software services will be used and paid for. AWS has reimagined how you can use computing infrastructure. Wikipedia has made it normal to pay 0$ for the biggest encyclopedia ever created.

With new technologies like Mobile, VR, 3D Printing, Big Data, Machine Learning AI, it is increasingly possible to reimagine businesses and how things are being done like never before. And these technologies are getting better and better. Take a look at the following image from Qualcomm.

21 Sensors
(Source: Qualcomm)

There are increasingly new sensors embedded in Mobiles. It is possible to think that Healthcare can be reimagined with all these new sensors in the Mobile. Some other sectors like Health Insurance too can be reimagined.

Many businesses can be reimagined if we remove any assumptions and start from scratch (the thinking called ‘First Principles’). Elon Musk talks about such ‘First Principles’ type of thinking:

“The normal way we conduct our lives is we reason by analogy… With analogy we are doing this because it’s like something else that was done, or it is like what other people are doing…  [With first principles] you boil things down to the most fundamental truths … and then reason up from there.”

Let us take the example of Consulting. It is possible to simple build a marketplace online connecting top consultants and clients improving the discovery and pricing. Some companies like Hourly Nerd and Expert360 are doing this. But that would just be replicating and not particularly reimagining Consulting as a business.

How can Consulting be reimagined? There are tons of free high quality content on the internet – blogs, articles, journals etc. Can you use technology to convert all of those into high quality advice? With Big Data, Machine Learning and AI it is increasingly possible. Startups like Orbital Insight are applying Machine Learning to satellite images to advice clients in Retail, Mining and Agriculture etc.

Note that startups like Orbital Insight use Big Data and Machine Learning while Hourly Nerd and Expert360 still use just the Internet without using any of the newer ones.

As a rule of thumb, businesses will be fundamentally reimagined as newer and newer technologies come about.

For example, the Internet sparked promises of a virtual workplace where people can login from their homes without having to show up for work (at least for the white collar ones). That clearly didn’t pan out well. I still have to go to office braving the Bangalore traffic.

But can Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality, two newer technologies deliver on that promise of a virtual workplace? There is a startup called AltspaceVR whose tagline is ‘Be together, in person’. It’s developing a virtual reality platform in which people can connect with one another in a kind of digital lobby. Represented by humanoid avatars, AltspaceVR users can speak with one another, communicate via body language and share experiences. It works whether users are wearing the cheaper Samsung Gear VR headset, or the high-end Oculus Rift or HTC Vive Pre.

VR might finally enable people to work remotely and with no loss of accountability and productivity. There will be profound implications of this in other areas as well. A significant number of vehicles on roads is about going to work. Congested cities are because a lot of jobs reside there. Real estate becomes costly in congested cities. Commutes are longer in such cities. If a good enough Virtual Workplace is rendered, there will be profound implications. People can spend time with their children more, move to a place with far lower rent, pollution will decrease etc.

When you think about the plans of AltspaceVR, Facebook’s acquisition of Oculus Rift two years back makes a lot of sense. Social will be huge in VR. Distant friends can connect with each other (the core service of Facebook) via Virtual Reality and can feel like being in the same physical space wherever they like to be.

Similarly VR will likely reimagine movies as we know them. Users might be able to be in movies or be able to direct the flow of a story based on their actions.

Think about News. The Internet has been a great democratizing medium for news. More people can write their opinions, people can amplify their voice through tweets and hashtags and people other than reporters can arguably break news.

22 Osama Tweet

The above was a tweet by a little known user Sohaib Athar unintentionally breaking the news of the Osama Bin Laden raid in Abbottabad.

There has been some successes in the Internet only news. Huffington Post and Buzzfeed (interestingly both co-founded by Jonah Peretti) are some of them. There has been some flirtations with different revenue models. New York Times makes money from monthly subscriptions of their digital content rather than relying on advertisements. Buzzfeed makes money from native advertising. They publish sponsored content that you wouldn’t even realize. For example, here’s one of its ‘lists’ – something that it regularly publishes: “15 bands that probably wouldn’t exist without Led Zeppelin”. Who wrote it? Spotify! “9 things that have changed in the last 20 years” by… Motorola!

The distribution of news has changed. But how the news is produced is yet to be fundamentally reimagined. Just like tens of thousands of volunteers have built Wikipedia, can hundreds of thousands of citizens be brought together to build the best unbiased investigative journalism platform? People consume news and pretty much don’t follow up on it. Also, some very important news doesn’t get much attention. Can you bring together journalism, the power of social media and the power of Crowdfunding to take immediate action following reading some news?

Food is another interesting example. Some very bold attempts are being made other than just connecting customers with restaurants. Hampton Creek is an ambitious food startup that wants to rethink food from the ground up. The company swaps meat based proteins for plant based ones while trying to retain the taste. The company currently has three products – Just Mayo, Just Cookie Dough and Just Cookies (all egg free products) and has distribution deals with Walmart, Safeway, Target and Costco. The company achieves better results because of its database of thousands of species of plants and uses machine learning algorithms to model likely ingredients in its products. The company is at the intersection of plant biology and machine learning (and good branding).

There’s a startup called Impossible Foods funded by Google Ventures which makes tasty burgers where the ‘meat’ and cheese is entirely made from plants. Here’s a video on the same. The meat-free burger bleeds and sizzles just like meat!

20 Impossible Foods

How long would people recruit with resumes? If you were given the opportunity to reimagine recruitment, how would you do it? Would you just collect and parse resumes online? Would you filter candidates according to their GPA? Or would you use new technologies to quickly rate them from other exhibits like blogs, Quora answers, Github submissions etc.?

How would you reimagine education? Are lectures necessary? What should be the role of a human ‘teacher’? Can people learn from their homes? How would you change the curriculum? Would students solve tough real life problems while they are learning? What new technologies would be used?

There are so many opportunities with new technologies to reimagine businesses. Will investors fund such businesses? Will Government allow these business models to be deployed? But I’m sure bold entrepreneurs are not in short supply!

Five Barriers that customers face

When looking for new business opportunities or new investment opportunities in startups, it is useful to think about the customer and the barriers they face with existing products and services (let us call them solutions) in getting a job done. Customers face five common barriers while getting their job done:

  1. Wealth Barrier: Existing products and services may not be affordable. Healthcare that is not affordable, education that is not affordable, insurance premiums that are too high, consultants who charge high fee etc.
  2. Time Barrier: Not enough time to get the job done. No time to prepare food, no time to learn something, no time to shop around etc.
  3. Access Barrier: It is not possible to get access to something. For example, not able to access lectures of a Harvard Professor. Not able to access a talented programmer in India or a designer in Africa. Not able to access startup investments in emerging markets. Not able to access a collectible or a first edition of an obscure book.
  4. Skill Barrier: Customer does not have the skills to get the job done. For example, doesn’t have skill to create a website. Doesn’t have the skill to do financial valuations. Doesn’t have the skill to analyze big data. Doesn’t have the skill to manage accounts. Doesn’t have the skill to design marketing materials.
  5. Motivation Barrier: The customer knows how to get the job done but doesn’t have the motivation to get it done. Doesn’t have motivation to lose weight or doesn’t have motivation to study something that will help in career are obvious examples.

Startups have been using technology to lower barriers and bringing important solutions to customers. Some examples:

Barrier Company Description
Wealth Wikipedia Quality and Biggest Encyclopedia at zero cost
Khan Academy Thousands of lessons at zero cost
Rent the Runway Designer dresses and Jewelry at low cost
Oscar Reduced Insurance Premiums
McDonalds Reliable and Standardized low cost food
Walmart Low cost retailer
AirBnB Low cost hospitality
AWS Low capex computing infrastructure
Time Amazon Shopping a click away
Uber A cab appears in minutes
WordPress Get your blog in seconds
Glucose Meters Health monitoring at your convenience
Minute Clinic Quick resolution and treatment of common non-critical diseases
Access eBay Access to items difficult to find
Netflix Access to movies and television content
Charles Schwab Access to top funds
Lending Club Access to lenders
Kickstarter Access to donors and patrons
Google Access to information
Facebook Access to friends
Innocentive Access to solvers across the world
Coursera Access to top professors and universities
YouTube Access to a wide audience
Tinder Access to potential mates
Skill Intuit Easy tax preparation and accounting
WordPress Easy publishing of thoughts
AWS Easy access to infrastructure
Pregnancy Tests Easy checking for pregnancy
Spreadsheets Easy records and finance
Motivation Top Coder Play games and get recruited
FoldIt Play and fold proteins
HopeLab Play and fight cancer

A lot of opportunities exist in drastically lowering each of the above barriers. Consulting, Education, Healthcare, Recruitment, Law, Philanthropy, Pharma, Venture Capital etc. are likely to be transformed.

Wealth, Skill and Motivation Barriers fascinate me particularly. Will elaborate on these in future posts.


Poor Defenders

Some incumbents are poor defenders against disruptive threats by new entrants. As a result when the opportunity arrives they are excellent targets for disruption. Four main categories come to mind:

1. Regulated and Protected Businesses

Highly regulated and protected businesses are poor defenders precisely because for a period of time they are under no pressure to defend. In the western world, they are stodgy old private companies and in developing countries like India they are owned by the Government themselves.

But two major changes may threaten these businesses:

  • These traditionally non-technological businesses are being converted into technology businesses. New York Taxi Cabs and Marriot would not have dreamt they would be challenged by tech businesses like Uber and AirBnB
  • The new tech entrants often operate as platforms and operate under grey areas of regulation but grow very, very fast before the protected businesses can react

And new tech entrants challenging these businesses need not necessarily follow the traditional disruptive path – hiding behind ‘asymmetric motivations’ by initially serving a different customer than that of incumbents and gradually upwards. These new tech entrants can focus directly on the main customer of these protected businesses. This different route has prodded Clayton Christensen to pronounce Uber as ‘not disruptive’ in the strict technical definition of his theory of disruption.

The jury is still out on AirBnB and Uber but it is far from a foregone conclusion that it will favor protected incumbents as has traditionally been the case.

More protected businesses may be opened up in the future because of rising customer costs. Combine that with stagnant labor wages and the Government will ultimately be left with no other choice but to open businesses like healthcare, education and insurance up for technology innovation.

The fate of Indian state owned telecom provider BSNL after the telecom business was opened up is a good example of what happens to protected businesses.

2. Non-Technology Businesses

When non-technology businesses can be converted into technology businesses, the non-tech incumbents suffer and may not have any appropriate defense.

With internet and mobile and other new technologies, traditional non-tech businesses like education, taxi services, hotels, consulting services will have a technology core. And when such industries acquire a technology core, the new business models built are radically different and will have far lower prices. If there is overlap of such incumbents with the previous category, rent seeking and lobbying is the often the only resort.

3. Bundled Businesses

Bundling made a lot of sense (to the businesses more than the customer) in a particular context. Bundle hundreds of channels with your cable TV subscription. Bundle lecturing, sports and games, hostels etc. into a university. Cater to multiple industries and themes as a consulting company. Bundle all types of healthcare – diagnosis, advice, surgery, care etc. in a hospital.  Bundle all news topics – politics, international events, sports, entertainment in a newspaper. Bundle loans, deposits, payments, wealth management into a bank. Bundle multiple songs into an album.

But as tech intervenes more and more, bundled businesses make far less sense for different reasons:

  1. Customers are happy to pay a far lower price for some specific services and not the entire bundle. Pay for one song than an entire album. Pay for three channels than for a hundred.
  2. Different solutions in the bundle may be affected by technology differently. One reason for this is because the business model is vastly different. For example, in a hospital, you pay a doctor for his expert advice and his reputation. Your pay for a surgery depends on the procedure and associated costs.
  3. Focusing on one service rather than a bundle can yield far greater results for customers. Hypothetically consider the example of a university (online or offline) which wants to excel only in teaching. They are fanatic about their pedagogy and continuously try to test how different methods yield different results. They invested in teachers who can motivate students and who may not necessarily be the best researchers. My guess is this will result in far greater outcomes for customers than a bundled university which offers all bells and whistles.

Check out this fantastic image by CB Insights on different startups going after different services offered by a bundled bank!


Death by a thousand cuts!

In fact Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan CEO had the following to say in his annual letter to shareholders:

“There are hundreds of startups with a lot of brains and money working on various alternatives to traditional banking. The ones you read about most are in the lending business, whereby the firms can lend to individuals and small businesses very quickly and – these entities believe – effectively by using Big Data to enhance credit underwriting. They are very good at reducing the ‘pain points’ in that they can make loans in minutes, which might take banks weeks. We are going to work hard to make our services as seamless and competitive as theirs. And we also are completely comfortable with partnering where it makes sense.”

Just to be clear, bundled businesses are different from conglomerates. Bundled businesses often price their bundled solution or at the very least are overseen by the same manager.

4. Asset Heavy Businesses

Asset heavy businesses operating in a prior technology are under serious disadvantage. When new entrants with a new technology, threaten their businesses, the manager of the incumbent makes a ‘rational decision’. Rather than investing in the new technology, he decides to produce with the old technology.

Why? Because the huge capital investments have already been made. If you have two options:
1. Produce under the old technology. You will incur lower marginal costs of producing a product because the fixed costs have already been made.
2. Invest in new technology with fixed costs again and a lower variable cost.

It is tempting to choose the first option. But remember that you have to treat the old technology with old capabilities as a sunk cost and invest in new technologies as soon as possible.

The Indian company Moserbaer which was the market leader in manufacturing DVDs missed this crucial point and continued producing DVDs because they made the high fixed costs investment and went bankrupt. Mini mills taking on integrated mills is another good example of this.

Asset Heavy Business models are also prone to be attacked by asset light platforms like Uber, AirBnB, Netflix etc.

From an investment point of view, investing in startups attacking ‘poor defenders’ is a great idea. Poor Defense + Large Market!!!

All Disruptions are Not equal

Prof. Clayton Christensen in his book ‘The Innovator’s Solution’ tries to address the ‘Innovator’s Dilemma’ – the dilemma of whether or not the incumbent should go after the new entrant. The dilemma arises for one or more of the following reasons:

1. The new customers cannot be served profitably
2. It is a tiny market that won’t move the needle on the stock price in the next quarter
3. The employees and processes are invested in the incumbent business model
4. Fear of cannibalization of highly profitable products

He suggests the incumbent create a small company within the company but a planet away from processes and employees of current business model but shepherded by the CEO himself. The new company’s only mandate is to grow their new business and not to play second fiddle or reinforce the current business. ‘Disrupt yourself or be disrupted’. You don’t have a choice. This advice will give you the best odds of survival. But are the odds good enough?

The environment has shifted more than a decade after the Innovator’s solution was published. I think in spite of the seemingly large resources of the incumbent, there is no guarantee that the advice of creating a new business would solve the threat of a new entrant effectively. The following are my reasons:

1. New Entrants in an Industry may be ‘cash rich’ Incumbents in another Industry

Microsoft Encarta taking on Britannica. Apple disrupting music with iTunes. Google’s driverless cars will inevitably compete against Automobile incumbents.

When you have the cash chest of tech companies like Microsoft, Google and Apple, your resource advantage vanishes. On top of that, the best engineering talent will move to these companies attempting to your industry creating a massive skill gap between you and these ‘new entrants’.

The mega cash rich tech companies will spread their tentacles in every big Industry or will seek to acquire the best startups, its technology and talent. The Incumbent often will have no other chance but to die a painful death.

2. The money and resources required to startup a company has decreased enormously

In the past decade the amount of money it takes to start up a company has decreased drastically. So the software startups eating the world, are not at a resource disadvantage when it comes to incumbents thanks to widespread adoption of cheap and scalable pay-as-you-use computing resources from companies like AWS which eliminates huge capital expenditure.

When you eliminate resource disadvantage, what matters are things like speed, domain competence and technical competence where startups have almost always had a great advantage.

3. A world awash in capital

Some estimates say that the global invested capital market is around $100 trillion while the global GDP is only $80 trillion. Bain Capital estimates the gap to be a far bigger number. Here is an astonishing graph from the Bain report.

8 Capital superabundance

In this age of ‘capital superabundance’, what matters more (and is scarce) is good ideas and entrepreneurs to invest. Capital is not the scarcity. This scenario again removes the resource advantage of incumbents.

Which leads me to speculate that not all disruptions are equal. Some are just deadly and incumbents will stand almost no chance against new entrants. Sometimes there may just be no successful defense.



Holy Grail Tradeoffs

When I think about technology and startups, one reason I believe disruptive tech startups bring progress is because Technology can overcome seemingly impossible trade-offs.

Some parameters in a product or service cannot all be ideal. For example if you think about food, the cost of the food, the healthiness of the food, the taste of the food and time to get the food done cannot all be ideal. Improving the healthiness probably means the food ends up costing more. Reducing the time of preparation of food may mean the food tastes bad or is less healthy.

Let us call these such parameters as Holy Grail Parameters – parameters valued by customers but which all cannot be ideal at the same time. The trade-offs that you have to make in these parameters are what we can call Holy Grail Trade-offs. Some top-of-the-mind examples of such Holy-Grail Trade-offs.


Holy Grail Parameters that require trade-offs

Manufacturing ·         Price of the product

·         Customization of the product

Call center service ·         Training and wage costs of employees

·         Time to resolve customer complaints

·         Customer service satisfaction scores

Loans ·         Time taken to disburse the loan

·         Costs incurred in disbursing the loan

·         Quality of the loan

·         Rate of Interest

Books ·         Price of books

·         Number of books

·         Size of the bookshelf

College ·         Price of Education

·         Quality of Education

·         Access to Education

·         Reputation of Education

·         Time to complete Education

Computing ·         Size and Portability

·         Computing Power

·         Price

News ·         Cost of Acquiring News

·         Access to News

·         Time to produce News

Recruitment ·         Cost of recruiting process

·         Time to recruit

·         Quality of process

·         Quality of talent

Venture Capital ·         %Equity startup gives to VC

·         Advice and Network of VC

·         Access to funds

·         Time to raise funds

Hospitals ·         Cost of healthcare

·         Quality of healthcare

·         Access to healthcare

Movies ·         Cost of producing the movie

·         Quality of the movie

·         Access to funders of the movie

·         Time to create the movie

Consulting ·         Cost of Consultant

·         Price of Consulting

·         Quality of Consulting

·         Time to provide advice

Some iconic products have been built by challenging trade-offs like the above.

It is useful for an entrepreneur who is looking to startup to consider the trade-offs in the area she is starting up. Can she push these Holy Grail trade-offs? For example, can she drive the price of consulting down while maintaining comparable quality? Or can she reduce time to produce advice while maintaining comparable quality? Or if it is a recruitment startup, can she maintain quality of candidates hired while reducing the time to hire drastically?

An important note on disruption here. Disruption theory states that disruption starts by serving over-served or non-consumers and starts with by under-performing on parameters, not necessarily by overcoming trade-offs. I believe there is huge scope for relative trade-offs. For example, offering 80% of the performance at 10% of the cost. For example, if you are hypothetically starting a MBA education startup (if the Government allows you to, yes hence the word ‘hypothetically’), can you make sure 80% of the students who take your MBA course graduate with good jobs while only costing 10% of what the current MBA colleges charge and the average student will take only 50% of the time to get the education. Those are huge relative trade-offs and such a business is highly disruptive.

Opportunities to overcome such trade-offs exist in so many areas. And technology precisely overcomes these trade-offs. VCs rather than following a trend can look at new investments through the lens of such trade-offs. I hope venture investors in India don’t fund the millionth hyper-local startup or food delivery startup and find entrepreneurs who are willing to work on challenging these trade-offs and in the process build great businesses.


Are you challenging Lucrative Business Assumptions?

All businesses have multiple assumptions embedded in the way they operate. You can get a wind of these assumptions in their processes, the customers they serve, their pricing, their distribution model, how they make use of available resources, their decision making related to the near term and long term future etc.

Some of these assumptions may be so fundamental that it is easy to take them for granted and mistake them to be laws that you cannot defy. Let us call these assumptions basic assumptions. But both incumbent businesses and new entrants who seek to disrupt businesses must remember this:
1. These assumptions have a context. These assumptions are mostly present because of constraints of a previous technology which are not broken yet. Some assumptions may also be present because of things like culture and social norms or say Government regulations which may not have changed yet.
2. These assumptions can be challenged, most commonly through technology

I wrote a post on how technology challenges some very basic assumptions through what I call fundamental distortions of technology.

There are some basic assumptions what I like to call as Lucrative Assumptions. They are assumptions which are so hard to challenge that when challenged, successfully yield mega businesses.

These are some top of my mind lucrative assumptions which when challenged can yield the next big blockbuster (I have sworn not to use the word ‘unicorn’) startups:

7 Lucrative Assumptions List

Peter Thiel in his advice to entrepreneurs often tells them to ‘build companies that nobody is building’. It can also be framed as ‘what entrenched basic lucrative assumption are you challenging that nobody else is challenging’.

I can go on about lucrative assumptions in other areas as well. Each of the above assumptions are taken for granted, very basic and very hard to challenge and the average startup does not take up the challenge. A hard problem and hard solution. Precisely why startups challenging Lucrative Assumptions like the above are worth investing from an investor point of view. (Hope Indian VCs fund business models that challenge such assumptions and not the 100th hyperlocal startup or 50th personal assistant startup or whatever the fad is.)

It is also an interest and fun activity to try to understand which technology or a combination of technologies is most likely to challenge these assumptions the best.